Chu, S.; Handley, V.; Cooper, S.R

From GTMS
Revision as of 02:29, 13 January 2026 by Raymond90T (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<br>In psychology, context-dependent memory is the improved recall of specific episodes or information when the context current at encoding and retrieval are the same. In a easier manner, "when occasions are represented in memory, contextual information is stored together with memory targets; the context can therefore cue memories containing that contextual information". One particularly frequent instance of context-dependence at work happens when an individual has lost...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


In psychology, context-dependent memory is the improved recall of specific episodes or information when the context current at encoding and retrieval are the same. In a easier manner, "when occasions are represented in memory, contextual information is stored together with memory targets; the context can therefore cue memories containing that contextual information". One particularly frequent instance of context-dependence at work happens when an individual has lost an item (e.g. misplaced car keys) in an unknown location. Sometimes, folks attempt to systematically "retrace their steps" to determine the entire potential locations where the merchandise is likely to be located. Based on the role that context plays in figuring out recall, it isn't in any respect shocking that individuals usually quite simply discover the misplaced item upon returning to the proper context. This concept is heavily associated to the encoding specificity precept. This example best describes the concept of context-dependent forgetting. However, Memory Wave the research literature on context-dependent memory describes quite a few different types of contextual info that will have an effect on recall similar to environmental context-dependent memory, state-dependent learning, cognitive context-dependent memory and temper-congruent memory.



Analysis has also shown that context-dependence might play an necessary position in quite a few conditions, corresponding to memory for studied material, Memory Wave or events that have occurred following the consumption of alcohol or other medication. A number of the earliest research on this topic was conducted by researchers within the thirties who analyzed how changes in context affect a person's memory for nonsense syllables. These early research were unable to exhibit an effect of context-dependent memory. Such non-significant results inspired the development of latest methods, reminiscent of a retroactive interference paradigm, to analyze the effect of context on Memory Wave Routine. By the 1950s, this technique was used to exhibit an effect of contextual data on memory recall. However, the validity of using this specific paradigm has been questioned. Certainly, much of the early literature on this matter failed to provide conclusive evidence of any context-dependent results on memory. By the top of the 1970s, numerous profitable demonstrations of a context-dependent impact seem in the literature.



As early as 1971, Memory Wave Routine Jensen et al. In a similar timeframe, Endel Tulving and Donald Thompson proposed their extremely influential 'encoding specificity precept', which offered the primary framework for understanding how contextual data impacts memory and recall. In 1975, the question of whether or not contextual information influences memory recall was famously investigated with the publication of Godden and Baddeley's paper detailing the effectively-identified 'diving research'. Just a few years previous to the publication of this study, researchers demonstrated that the memory of deep sea divers for occasions witnessed underwater was diminished after resurfacing. The authors word in their 1975 paper that this incidental outcome immediately advised a doable influence of the contextual surroundings (being underwater) on recall. To test this speculation, Godden and Baddeley had divers learn and recall phrase lists in two separate environments; below water and on dry land. Their outcomes demonstrated that memory for phrase lists learned below water was better when recall periods occurred beneath water as effectively, and that a congruent impact existed for phrases learned and recalled on land.



In simplified kind: Memory Wave Routine altering the context between encoding and retrieval diminished the divers' potential to recall realized phrases.